A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Prakasam, S.
- Grey Wolf Optimizer for Constrained Hardware-Software Codesign Partitioning
Authors
Source
Programmable Device Circuits and Systems, Vol 8, No 8 (2016), Pagination: 239-243Abstract
Hardware/software codesign is the main approach to designing the embedded systems. One of the primary steps of the hardware/software codesign is the hardware/software partitioning. Most electronic systems, whether self-contained or embedded, have a predominant digital component consisting of a hardware platform which executes software application programs. Hardware/software co-design means meeting system-level objectives by exploiting the synergism of hardware and software through their concurrent design. Hardware/software partitioning is a crucial problem in embedded system design. Co-design problems have different flavors according to the application domain, implementation technology and design methodology. The optimization algorithm which is recently introduced is called Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) is introduced for better performance. Digital hardware design has increasingly more similarities to software design. Hardware circuits are often described using modeling or programming languages, and they are validated and implemented by executing software programs, which are sometimes conceived for the specific hardware design.
Keywords
Hardware/Software, Co-design partitioning, Genetic Algorithm (GA), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)- Performance Assessment of Different Classification Techniques
Authors
1 Department of Computer Science and Applications, SCSVMV University, Enathur, IN
Source
Data Mining and Knowledge Engineering, Vol 9, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 20-23Abstract
In Data mining, Classification of data is very emblematic task. Given a vector of attributes, to predict the value of selected discrete class variable correctly is the goal of Classification. The main objective of this work is from the performance evaluation of different classifiers of data mining techniques to find the best classifier. A study has been conducted during December 2016-January 2017 with different category respondents of 1023. The questionnaire was designed to collect the factors about common cyber crime threats among the various sectors respondents in and around Chennai. For the purpose of concluding best classifier among different classifiers, the WEKA tool is used. In this study, J48, BayesNet, RandomForest, Logistic classifiers were used for the purpose of analyzing the best classifier for the cyber crime dataset. The Classification technique that has latent to extensively advance the common or predictable methods will be recommended for use in many sectors.Keywords
BayesNet, Classification, J48, Kappa Statistic, Logistic, RandomForest, Simulation error, WEKA.- Performance Analysis of Energy Efficient Dynamic Multilayer Cluster Designing Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Network
Authors
1 Department of CSA, SCSVMV University, Kanchipuram - 631561, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 9, No 48 (2016), Pagination:Abstract
Objective: Reliability and Energy conservation are two main factors to be considered in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) is widely used in time-critical applications. WSN are resource constrained, so developing energy efficient protocols is a major concern in sensor networks. Multilayer clusters are preferred for sensors used in Remote Monitoring applications. When the position of sensor changes then it becomes very difficult to conserve energy as the cluster head is mainly responsible for delivery of the data. Protocols like EADUC, TLPER follows Multilayer clustering approach. The main aim of this paper is to develop dynamic clusters with less energy consumption. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The proposed method D-MCDA is efficient when the location of nodes varies dynamically and the clusters are formed based on their locations which proves efficient when compared to other protocols. First all the nodes are involved in the formation of the cluster and then the Cluster head is selected. The actual data packet is sent from the source to destination and the consumption of energy is calculated for various protocols and their results are compared. Findings: As energy consumption was the main motivation, use of multilayer and additional cluster heads have reduced the energy consumption by 0.019. The Proposed D-MCDA algorithms have performed better in terms of average energy consumption per node and in the process of designing a cluster. The proposed algorithm is compared with the existing algorithm like TLPER and MCDA. Applications/Improvements: Energy Consumption is very essential in applications like Remote monitoring, process control and automations. Reliability is another issue to be considered as it is another major reason for energy depletion. Reliability on the basis of congestion avoidance scheme, acknowledgement mechanisms can be considered which can reduce the energy consumption to a major level.Keywords
Cluster Analysis, Cluster Head, Energy Consumption, Sensor Networks.- An Effective Data Mining Technique to Identify and Classify Respiratory Diseases in Children and Adults
Authors
1 Department of Computer Science and Applications, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Maha Vidyalaya, IN
Source
ICTACT Journal on Soft Computing, Vol 12, No 3 (2022), Pagination: 2601-2604Abstract
The authors of this study have built an outstanding data mining model for the classification of respiratory issues in children and adults, which they have applied in their research. Deep learning ensembles are built by utilising support vector regression (SVR), long short-term memory neural networks (LSTMs), and a metaheuristic optimization (MHO) strategy that incorporates nonlinear learning in the DL ensemble. A collection of LSTMs with variable hidden layers and neurons is used to detect and exploit the underlying relationships in order to overcome the limitations of a single deep learning approach limited generalisation skills and robustness when faced with diverse input. The LSTM classification is then combined with a nonlinear-learning SVR and MHO to optimise the top-layer parameters. Nonlinear-learning meta-layer and LSTM classification. Finally, the final classification of the ensemble is provided by the fine-tuning meta-layer. Using data from six benchmark studies as well as energy consumption data sets, the proposed EDL is put to the test in two classification scenarios: ten-ahead and one-ahead classification.Keywords
Data Mining, Ensemble Deep Learning, Support Vector Regression, Metaheuristic Optimization AlgorithmReferences
- D. Tomar and S. Agarwal, “A Survey on Data Mining Approaches for Healthcare”, International Journal of BioScience and Bio-Technology, Vol. 5, No. 5, pp. 241-266, 2013.
- M. Saberi-Karimian and M. Ghayour-Mobarhan, “Potential Value and Impact of Data Mining and Machine Learning in Clinical Diagnostics”, Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Vol. 58, No. 4, pp. 275-296, 2021.
- S. Vijiyarani and S. Sudha, “Disease Prediction in Data Mining Technique-A Survey”, International Journal of Computer Applications and Information Technology, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 17-21, 2013.
- M.H.B.M. Adnan and F. Damanhoori, “A Survey on Utilization of Data Mining for Childhood Obesity Prediction”, Proceedings of Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information and Telecommunication Technologies, pp. 1-6, 2010.
- D. Piedra, A. Ferrer and J. Gea, “Text Mining and Medicine: Usefulness in Respiratory Diseases”, Archivos De Bronconeumología (English Edition), Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 113-119, 2014.
- H. Baek, M. Cho and S. Yoo, “Analysis of Length of Hospital Stay using Electronic Health Records: A Statistical and Data Mining Approach”, PloS One, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1-14, 2018.
- A.S. Monto and B.M. Ullman, “Acute Respiratory Illness in an American Community: the Tecumseh Study”, Jama, Vol. 227, No. 2, pp. 164-169, 1974.
- P. Ahmad, S. Qamar and Q.A. Rizvi, “Techniques of Data Mining in Healthcare: A Review”, International Journal of Computer Applications, Vol. 120, No. 15, pp. 1-16, 2015.
- M. Mozaffarinya, A.R. Shahriyari and G. Vahedi, “A Data-Mining Algorithm to Assess Key Factors in Asthma Diagnosis”, Revue Française d'Allergologie, Vol. 59, No. 7, pp. 487-492, 2019.
- C.E. Wheelock, V.M. Goss and P.J. Skipp, “Application of Omics Technologies to Biomarker Discovery in Inflammatory Lung Diseases”, European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 802-825, 2013.
- Y. Feng, Y. Wang and H. Mao, “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Chronic Airway Diseases: Focus on Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease”, International Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 2871-2879, 2021.
- M. Anthimopoulos and S. Mougiakakou, “Lung Pattern Classification for Interstitial Lung Diseases using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 1207-1216, 2016.
- A. Srivastava, S. Jain and K. Kotecha, “Deep Learning based Respiratory Sound Analysis for Detection of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease”, PeerJ Computer Science, Vol. 7, pp. 1-13, 2021.
- K.S. Alqudaihi, N. Aslam and M.S. Alshahrani, “Cough Sound Detection and Diagnosis using Artificial Intelligence Techniques: Challenges and Opportunities”, IEEE Access, Vol. 9, pp. 102327-102344, 2021.
- E. Oostveen, D. MacLeod and F. Marchal, “The Forced Oscillation Technique in Clinical Practice: Methodology, Recommendations and Future Developments”, European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 1026-1041, 2003.
- A Node Location Algorithm Based on Improved Grasshopper Optimization in Wireless Sensor Network
Authors
1 Department of Computer Science and Application, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi Viswa Maha Vidyalaya University, IN
Source
ICTACT Journal on Communication Technology, Vol 13, No 3 (2022), Pagination: 2767-2773Abstract
As the use of swarm intelligence algorithms grows, so does the interest in placing nodes in a Wireless Sensor network. For this reason, the RSSI range model positioning algorithm has been replaced by a more accurate one. With the help of this paper, you can solve complex structural optimization problems with the Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA). Optimization problems can be solved using this algorithm, which was inspired by the behaviour of grasshopper colonies. CEC2005 is used to test the GOA algorithm quality and quantitative performance. Trusses with a total of 53 and 3 cantilever beams are used to demonstrate the design practicality. It appears that the proposed algorithm outperforms well-known and recently developed algorithms in this area. GOA ability to solve real-world problems with unknown search spaces is demonstrated by its use in the real world.Keywords
WSN (Wireless Sensor Network), GOA (Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm), RSSI, Whale Optimization AlgorithmReferences
- P.Sindhuja and P.Ramamoorthy, “An Improved Fuzzy enabled Optimal Multipath routing for Wireless Sensor Networks”, Cluster Computing, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 1-15, 2017.
- M. Ghalambaz, R.J. Yengejeh and A.H. Davami, “Building Energy Optimization using Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO)”, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, Vol. 27, pp. 1-13, 2021.
- Z.Y. Algamal and H.T. Ali, “Improving Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm for Hyperparameters Estimation and Feature Selection in Support Vector Regression”, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, Vol. 208, pp. 104196-104201, 2021.
- B.S. Yıldız, A.R. Yıldız, E.S. Albak, H. Abderazek, S.M. Sait and S. Bureerat, “Butterfly Optimization Algorithm for Optimum Shape Design of Automobile Suspension Components”, Materials Testing, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 365-370, 2020.
- B.S. Yildiz, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, A.R. Yildiz and S.M. Sait, “Robust Design of a Robot Gripper Mechanism using New Hybrid Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm”, Expert Systems, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 1-16, 2021.
- A.R. Yıldız and M.U. Erdaş, “A New Hybrid Taguchi-Salp Swarm Optimization Algorithm for the Robust Design of Realworld Engineering Problems”, Materials Testing, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 157-162, 2021.
- N. Panagant, N. Pholdee, S. Bureerat, K. Kaen, A.R. Yıldız and S.M. Sait, “Seagull Optimization Algorithm for Solving Realworld Design Optimization Problems”, Materials Testing, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 640-644, 2020.
- A.R. Yıldız, B.S. Yıldız and S.M. Sait, “The Equilibrium Optimization Algorithm and the Response Surface-Based Metamodel for Optimal Structural Design of Vehicle Components”, Materials Testing, Vol. 62, No. 5, pp. 492-496, 2020.
- H. Abderazek, S.M. Sait and A.R. Yildiz, “Optimal Design of Planetary Gear Train for Automotive Transmissions using Advanced Meta-Heuristics”, International Journal of Vehicle Design, Vol. 80, No. 2-3, pp. 121-136, 2019.
- L. Chen, L. Pang and B. Zhou, “RLAN: Range-Free Localisation based on Anisotropy of Nodes for WLANs”, Electronics Letters, Vol. 51, No. 24, pp. 2066-2068, 2015.
- L. Sun, Y. Yuan, Q. Xu, C. Hua and X. Guan, “A Mobile Anchor Node Assisted RSSI Localization Scheme in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks”, Sensors, Vol. 19, No. 20, pp. 4369-4389, 2019.
- S.P. Maruthi and T. Panigrahi, “Robust Mixed Source Localization in WLAN using Swarm Intelligence Algorithms”, Digital Signal Processing, Vol. 98, No. 98, pp. 102651-102658, 2020.
- V. Bianchi, P. Ciampolini and I. De Munari, “RSSI-based Indoor Localization and Identification for ZigBee Wireless Sensor Networks in Smart Homes”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 566-575, 2019.
- C. Muller, D.I. Alves and J.B.S. Martins, “Improved Solution for Node Location Multilateration Algorithms in Wireless Sensor Networks”, Electronics Letters, Vol. 52, No. 13, pp. 1179-1181, 2016.
- S. Pan, S. Hua, D.W. Pan and X. Sun, “Wireless Localization Method based on AHP-WKNN and Amendatory AKF”, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Vol. 2021, pp. 1-11, 2021.
- H. Li, D. Yu, Y. Hu and H.Y. Yu, “Improved Trilateral Centroid Localization Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks”, Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 1216-1223, 2020.
- H. Ahmadi, F. Viani and R. Bouallegue, “An Accurate Prediction Method for Moving Target Localization and Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks”, Ad Hoc Networks, Vol. 70, pp. 14-22, 2018.
- S. Shah, C. Zhe and F.L. Yin, “3D Weighted Centroid Algorithm and RSSI Ranging Model Strategy for Node Localization in WLAN based on Smart Devices”, Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 39, pp. 298-308, 2018.
- K. Ren and C.M. Pan, “A Novel DV-Hop Algorithm for RSSI Hop Quantization and Error Correction”, Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 718-724, 2020.
- L.M. Schmitt and M. Schmitt, “Theory of Genetic Algorithms”, Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 259, No. 1-2, pp. 1-61, 2001.
- M. Dorigo, M. Birattari and T. Stutzle, “Ant Colony Optimization”, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 28-39, 2009.
- X.S. Yang, “Firefly Algorithms for Multimodal Optimization”, Mathematics, vol. 5792, pp. 169-178, 2009.
- S. Mirjalili, M. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, “Grey Wolf Optimizer”, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 69, pp. 46-61, 2014.
- S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, “The Whale Optimization Algorithm”, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 51-67, 2016.
- S.M. Li, H.L. Chen, M.J. Wang, A.A. Heidari and S. Mirjalili, “Slime Mould Algorithm: A New Method for Stochastic Optimization”, Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 111, pp. 300-323, 2020.
- Y.T. Yang, H.L. Chen, A.A. Heidari and A.H. Gandomi, “Hunger Games Search: Visions, Conception, Implementation, Deep Analysis, Perspectives, and Towards Performance Shifts”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 177, pp. 114864-114875, 2021.
- A.A. Heidari, S. Mirjalili, H. Faris, I. Aljarah, M. Mafarja and H. Chen, “Harris Hawks Optimization: Algorithm and Applications”, Future Generation Computer Systems, Vol. 97, pp. 849-872, 2019.
- S. Phoemphon and N. Leelathakul, “Improved Distance Estimation with Node Selection Localization and Particle Swarm Optimization for Obstacle-Aware Wireless Sensor Networks”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 175, pp. 114773-114785, 2021.
- F.S. Gharehchopogh and H. Gholizadeh, “A Comprehensive Survey: Whale Optimization Algorithm and its Applications”, Swarm Evolutionary Computing, Vol. 48, pp. 1-24, 2019.
- Y. Meng, Q. Zhi, Q. Zhang and E. Lin, “A Two-Stage Wireless Sensor Grey Wolf Optimization Node Location Algorithm based on K-Value Collinearity”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2020, pp. 1-10, 2020.
- H.M. Kanoosh, E.H. Houssein and M.M. Selim, “Salp Swarm Algorithm for Node Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks”, Journal of Computer Networks and Communications, Vol. 2019, pp. 1-12, 2019.
- J.S. Pan, F. Fan, S. Chu, Z. Du and H. Zhao, “A Node Location Method in Wireless Sensor Networks based on a Hybrid Optimization Algorithm”, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Vol. 2020, pp. 1-14, 2020.
- J. Luo, H. Chen, A.A. Heidari, Y. Xu, Q. Zhang and C. Li, “Multi-Strategy Boosted Mutative Whale-Inspired Optimization Approaches”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 73, pp. 109-123, 2019.
- Ahmed A Ewees, Mohamed Abd Elaziz and Essam H Houssein, “Improved Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm using Opposition-Based Learning”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 112, pp. 156-172, 2018.
- Laith Abualigah and Ali Diabat, “A Comprehensive Survey of the Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm: Results, Variants, and Applications”, Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 78, pp. 1-24, 2020.
- Shahrzad Saremi, Seyedali Mirjalili and Andrew Lewis, “Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm: Theory and Application”, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 105, pp. 30-47, 2017.
- S. Saremi, S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, “Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm: Theory and Application”, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 105, pp. 30-47, 2017.
- H. Pinto, A. Pena, M. Valenzuela and A. Fernandez, “A Binary Grasshopper Algorithm Applied to the Knapsack Problem”, Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms in Intelligent Systems, Vol. 764, pp. 1-14, 2019.
- B. Crawford, R. Soto, A. Pena and G. Astorga, “A Binary Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm applied to the Set Covering Problem”, Cybernetics and Algorithms in Intelligent Systems, Vol. 765, pp. 1-16, 2019.
- H. Hichem, M. Elkamel, M. Rafik, M.T. Mesaaoud and C. Ouahiba, “A New Binary Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm for Feature Selection Problem”, Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, Vol. 34, pp. 1-17, 2019.
- A. Saxena, S. Shekhawat and R. Kumar, “Application and Development of Enhanced Chaotic Grasshopper Optimization Algorithms”, Modelling and Simulation in Engineering, Vol. 2018, pp. 1-14, 2018.
- J. Luo, H. Chen, Q. Zhang, Y. Xu, H. Huang and X. Zhao, “An Improved Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm with Application to Financial Stress Prediction”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 64, pp. 654-668, 2018.
- H. Zhang, Z. Gao, J. Zhang and G. Yang, “Visual Tracking with Levy Flight Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm”, Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision, Vol. 11857, pp. 1-17, 2019.
- M. Mafarja, I. Aljarah, A.A. Heidari, A.I. Hammouri, H. Faris and, A.M. Al-Zoubi, “Evolutionary Population Dynamics and Grasshopper Optimization Approaches for Feature Selection Problems”, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 145, pp. 25-45, 2018.
- J. Wu, H. Wang, N. Li, P. Yao, Y. Huang and Z. Su, “Distributed Trajectory Optimization for Multiple Solar-Powered UAVs Target Tracking in Urban Environment by Adaptive Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm”, Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 70, pp. 497-510, 2017.
- S.R. Gampa, K. Jasthi, P. Goli, D. Das and R.C. Bansal, “Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm based Two Stage Fuzzy Multiobjective Approach for Optimum Sizing and Placement of Distributed Generations Shunt Capacitors and Electric Vehicle Charging Stations”, Journal of Energy Storage, Vol. 27, pp. 1-16, 2020.
- A.A. Ewees, M. Abd Elaziz and E.H. Houssein, “Improved Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm using Opposition-Based Learning”, Expert System and Applications, Vol. 112, pp. 156-172, 2018.
- Z. Elmi and M.O. Efe, “Multi-Objective Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm for Robot Path Planning in Static Environments”, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, pp. 244-249, 2018.
- J. Liu, A. Wang, Y. Qu and W. Wang, “Coordinated Operation of Multi-Integrated Energy System based on Linear Weighted Sum and Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm”, IEEE Access, Vol. 6, pp. 42186-42195, 2018.
- Q. Fan, X. Yan and Y. Xue, “Prior Knowledge Guided Differential Evolution”, Soft Computing, Vol. 21, No. 22, pp. 6841-6858, 2017.